SamyGO

for you no offtopic. I won`t ban you

bugficks wrote:+ PVRdrmDisable works only MST

Yes, just to compensate Oscam
(not sure C series are really concerned though )

I could think about drmdisable but whole pvrtots... is just an overkill Really this is a device for which you can decrypt recording even If you do not have root access Besides be aware that some patches (chances are higher with more complicated ones) will simply not work on C series

The problem is that bugficks that write first these patches don't want port to c series and onestly i don't know why. @sectroyer there are a lot of owners of c series but the problem is that for this series noone develop patch or app. You have to think that on other series the hacking and apply patches are more and more user friendly and simply on c series instead hacking process if you have a fw >3005 is hard to done you have to hack with hotel
Mode hack in manual way and this require that you have Linux and most people has only Windows. For others series there are lot of hacking method and are all ready to use and more simply to apply. Before for c serie there was a hacking image but it was deleted and never released again. I think if a simply hacking method will be released for c series more people will try and develop patch apps etc. Times ago i read a post from
Mmhorda ( viewtopic.php?f=12&t=6550) where he search help
for creating an hacking widget for c series like the one that was made for es series but no one help to achieve this gol. Another developer denny on this forum said that all the apps made for b series can be ported on c series after i finish to port sdl but then i never release or post more info. He know very well c series is the one that decrypt all internt@tv of c series but he abandoned the c series without sharing is knowledge.
So please don't stop coding for c series.

dude i ve told you before that i have no time nor the mood the port it. this is just a hobby for us and we do what we like to do. either do it yourself or hire a developer.
that said i ll charge 120-150eur/hour + i need a C series TV. you do the math

tempinbox wrote: with hotel
Mode hack in manual way and this require that you have Linux and most people has only Windows.

It took me five minutes to find this image ready on the web. If someone can't google a file he/she shouldn't root his/hers TV

tempinbox wrote: Times ago i read a post from
Mmhorda ( viewtopic.php?f=12&t=6550) where he search help
for creating an hacking widget for c series like the one that was made for es series but no one help to achieve this gol.

Sorry dude as a C series user I am not interested in hacking widget

bugficks wrote:dude i ve told you before that i have no time nor the mood the port it. this is just a hobby for us and we do what we like to do. either do it yourself or hire a developer.
that said i ll charge 120-150eur/hour + i need a C series TV. you do the math

Hehe. Nicely said.

tempinbox wrote: The problem is that bugficks that write first these patches don't want port to c series and honestly i don't know why.

He explained it many times... Moreover there are (almost) no function symbols in exeDSP. Just to explain to you clearly. Let's assume there is a patch that uses single function (do_A) on B/D/E/F you can find this function easily. It is nicely labeled, etc. On C however due to lack of symbols firstly you have to find this function manually (which can take few days), then create a patching method that will find location of this function automatically and will do reliably it on all C devices and after that you start to work on the patch itself Now let's take for example PVRtoTS patch which uses several functions which all you have to find manually,etc. Just to accomplish something that easily done with other tools (drmdisable/drmdecrypt)

Keep Calm and breathe. or play to Flappy Bird.(http://www.plonga.com/skill/Reaction/Fl ... rd-Online/) XD
my tv is hacked manual way and for me too it's an hobby to test the patch or modifications available for it.

ok, but the lack of C-Series Hardware should not be the problem
so as soon someone is in the mood to code some kind of oscam compatibel dvbapi for C / D Series, do not hesitate to contact the donors group

tempinbox wrote:Keep Calm and breathe. or play to Flappy Bird.(http://www.plonga.com/skill/Reaction/Fl ... rd-Online/) XD
my tv is hacked manual way and for me too it's an hobby to test the patch or modifications available for it.

I am just tired of reading posts like "why X does not like C series", "why Y will not port it to C series". I would not be able to port (at least it would be very, very hard) many of the patches that I have ported without the real hardware access Moreover even If I have full source code (like in SleepTimer case (WIP;) )) it still takes (on average) few days to port a patch to C (I have explained why earlier). So stop complaining and be patient Just to give you an example It usually takes me max 2-3 hours to port C patch to D/E

sectroyer wrote:

tempinbox wrote:Keep Calm and breathe. or play to Flappy Bird.(http://www.plonga.com/skill/Reaction/Fl ... rd-Online/) XD
my tv is hacked manual way and for me too it's an hobby to test the patch or modifications available for it.

I am just tired of reading posts like "why X does not like C series", "why Y will not port it to C series". I would not be able to port (at least it would be very, very hard) many of the patches that I have ported without the real hardware access Moreover even If I have full source code (like in SleepTimer case (WIP;) )) it still takes (on average) few days to port a patch to C (I have explained why earlier). So stop complaining and be patient Just to give you an example It usually takes me max 2-3 hours to port C patch to D/E

OK i understand SORRY sectroyer, Bugficks never write these things again