Page 2 of 4
Re: [App] Disable recordings encryption patch (E only)
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 9:14 pm
by francuccio
I followed the steps but when you launch the command samyGOso -d -D -l /mnt/opt/privateer/usr/libso/libRecFromSat.so
I get this message
Re: [App] Disable recordings encryption patch (E only)
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 9:39 pm
by zoelechat
francuccio wrote:I followed the steps but when you launch the command samyGOso -d -D -l /mnt/opt/privateer/usr/libso/libRecFromSat.so
I get this message
-Set Filezilla to
binary mode and transfer ALL files again.
-Don't use Putty, use Telnet
Re: [App] Disable recordings encryption patch (E only)
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:24 pm
by francuccio
Now when I send the command I get this and if I try to record on the TV I get "Unable to record"
In the bin folder is inserted only the files samyGOso?
Re: [App] Disable recordings encryption patch (E only)
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:42 pm
by zoelechat
Please give output of:
Which TV model?
Re: [App] Disable recordings encryption patch (E only)
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:42 pm
by francuccio
Samsung 55ES8000
Re: [App] Disable recordings encryption patch (E only)
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:43 pm
by sectroyer
francuccio wrote:Samsung 55ES8000
And to make life easier no log output
Re: [App] Disable recordings encryption patch (E only)
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:43 pm
by zoelechat
Maybe doesn't work on non-MST? No feedback yet.
Re: [App] Disable recordings encryption patch (E only)
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:44 pm
by sectroyer
zoelechat wrote:Maybe doesn't work on non-MST? No feedback yet.
Possible that's the "bug" I remembered.. I knew there was "something"...
Re: [App] Disable recordings encryption patch (E only)
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:48 pm
by zoelechat
sectroyer wrote:Possible that's the "bug" I remembered.. I knew there was "something"...
I was also surprised that such a simple NoDRM-for-non-MST was never done before. Editing title, just in case
Re: [App] Disable recordings encryption patch (E only)
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:50 pm
by sectroyer
zoelechat wrote:sectroyer wrote:Possible that's the "bug" I remembered.. I knew there was "something"...
I was also surprised that such a simple NoDRM-for-non-MST was never done before. Editing title, just in case
There is no and never will be "simple" (at least from programmers point of view) NoDRM-for-NON-MST