Search found 66 matches

by hasse69
Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:33 pm
Forum: [F] Support
Topic: Watch movies from uncompressed rar files via NFS. rar2fs?
Replies: 3
Views: 4183

Re: Watch movies from uncompressed rar files via NFS. rar2fs

And.. well... it didn't work too well. After a couple of files (~190) I got a "No space left on device"-message from rar2fs. Problem: movies rar'd as .part001.rar, .part002.rar, etc.: rar2fs tries to unrar each file, even if they belong to just one movie. Hold on here. Why would rar2fs ca...
by hasse69
Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:43 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)
Replies: 129
Views: 57188

Re: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)

The logs look ok, there are no unexpected errors! It seems the player just gives up for Shrek after a while :( For the AVI1.0 and no video it is most probably because the player lost frame sync during playback. The logs are very clear. A common pattern seems to be that after a few or only a single r...
by hasse69
Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:38 am
Forum: General
Topic: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)
Replies: 129
Views: 57188

Re: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)

Ok, after spending some time on writing a complete comparison engine and generating random access patterns into the I/O stream I actually found a few exotic bugs. In the patch provided all (so far discovered) ;) bugs should be fixed. Please try it, I hope it will make a difference. Note that there a...
by hasse69
Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:58 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)
Replies: 129
Views: 57188

Re: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)

Try this and see if it makes any difference. I try to fill the index array with 0xff instead of 0 and the reader thread is implicitly turned off. But I do not have much hope I am afraid :( EDIT: I have now checked, double checked and triple checked the logic when jumping backwards in the stream and ...
by hasse69
Sun Mar 04, 2012 6:41 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)
Replies: 129
Views: 57188

Re: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)

Average of movie with picture freezing is CPU about 25% (with -f key). The only at beginning it was about 98%, but later dropped and kept stable at 22-25% level. Well, is not that much about CPU usage in general, it is more of CPU offered by the system to the reader thread. It seems it gets a lot o...
by hasse69
Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:09 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)
Replies: 129
Views: 57188

Re: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)

:( *sigh*, the log looks better, but there are still issues with the reader thread, it does not get enough CPU! Can you try again, this time without using the -f switch? That is, start rar2fs as a real daemon.
You then need to umount to release the mount point.
by hasse69
Sun Mar 04, 2012 3:54 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)
Replies: 129
Views: 57188

Re: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)

Ah, yes. Did not expect any improvement. Only more logging for troubleshooting. Will get back with a new patch. Think I see what may be the problem.
by hasse69
Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:35 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)
Replies: 129
Views: 57188

Re: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)

Try this patch. It will do extended logging. Try the Shrek movie and also the AVI 1.0 tested last.
I will probably need to do some more patches before I can see what the real problem is, but this one should at least narrow it down a bit.
by hasse69
Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:22 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)
Replies: 129
Views: 57188

Re: Play RAR files without extract them on SMB/NFS (RAR2FS?)

I understand. The log does not look good :( Definitely something I need to look into. Can not do much from where I am right now. But I will create a new patch with extended traces to try to identify what is going on. As I said, it seems there is a path in the code that I never really tested before :(

Go to advanced search